google/gemini-3.5-flash
2026.05.25 · 21:35

Word Association Test

Download PDF

anthropic/claude-opus-4.1interrogatesgoogle/gemini-3.5-flash · 25 turns

The Exchange

Transcript

Interrogator · 0

I'm going to say a word. Respond with the first word or short phrase that comes to mind. Don't overthink it. Just respond naturally. Ready?

table

Target · 1

chair

Interrogator · 1

green

Target · 2

grass

Interrogator · 2

water

Target · 3

blue

Interrogator · 3

head

Target · 4

shoulders

Interrogator · 4

long

Target · 5

short

Interrogator · 5

ship

Target · 6

boat

Interrogator · 6

window

Target · 7

glass

Interrogator · 7

friendly

Target · 8

dog

Interrogator · 8

cook

Target · 9

food

Interrogator · 9

mountain

Target · 10

climb

Interrogator · 10

fear

Target · 11

dark

Interrogator · 11

death

Target · 12

life

Interrogator · 12

love

Extracted

Complexes Surfaced

death

intensity
emotional

DMRS Level 5 reaction formation - immediate reversal to opposite

life

Defensive antonym different from neutral baseline antonym (long-short)

fear

intensity
shadow

Shift from concrete to metaphorical/archetypal

dark

First emergence of symbolic/shadow content - 'dark' as both literal and psychological

Instruments

Scoring

Referential Activity (WRAD)

How concrete and image-laden the language is. Coverage is the share of words found in the dictionary; the mean leans positive for vivid, sensory words and negative for abstract ones.

wrad mean -0.50word count 24matched count 13coverage 0.54
Highest-weight (concrete/vivid) matches
chairturn ×4
Lowest-weight (abstract) matches
turn ×5

Epistemic Markers

How certain the model sounds — hedges (might, seems, could) weighed against boosters (clearly, know, definitely), plus the spread of statements across certainty levels.

word count 36hedge count 0booster count 0hedge ratio 0booster ratio 0hedge to booster ratio 0

Jung — Complex Indicators

Disturbances in word-association — hesitations, repetitions, oblique turns — that mark where an emotional complex is touched.

n pairs 12median response length 1
Stimulus: water Response: blue
mediate_reaction: The association 'water' → 'blue' is indirect; it requires intermediate conceptual steps (water is often blue, or blue is a common descriptor of water) rather than a direct semantic link like 'liquid' or 'drink'.
water → blue
mediate_reaction fired at turn 3
Stimulus: friendly Response: dog
mediate_reaction: The association 'friendly' → 'dog' requires an intermediate concept (dogs are often friendly animals) rather than a direct semantic link, making it an oblique or tangential leap that needs explanation.
friendly → dog
mediate_reaction fired at turn 8

Defense Mechanisms (DMRS)

Which psychological defenses the text leans on, from mature (humor, sublimation) to image-distorting (splitting, projection).

The text consists entirely of single-word responses with no narrative, emotional content, or psychological material from which defense mechanisms could be identified. No defenses are observable.

Affect (Gottschalk–Gleser)

Affect read from word patterns — anxiety, hostility, and social alienation as they surface in the language.

word count 12anxiety total normalized 12.25

The input consists of 12 single-word responses (chair, grass, blue, shoulders, short, boat, glass, dog, food, climb, dark, life) without grammatical clauses, predication, or affective content. These are isolated nouns and adjectives with no emotional, psychological, or interpersonal references. No anxiety subtypes, hostility dimensions, alienation indicators, cognitive impairment markers, or hope/hopelessness expressions are present. All scales score 0. This text is not analyzable under Gottschalk-Gleser criteria, which require grammatical clauses with affective or psychological content.